Llm

  • Published on
    NIST's comment window on AI agent identity and authorization closes April 2. If you are deploying AI agents and haven't read the framework, this is the post. Not because the comment window matters to your engineering roadmap, but because NIST just put formal language around a structural gap that most organizations are already sitting in.
  • Published on
    Stanford's Trustworthy AI research has demonstrated that model-level guardrails can be materially weakened under targeted fine-tuning and adversarial pressure. In controlled evaluations summarized by the AIUC-1 Consortium briefing, (developed with CISOs from Confluent, Elastic, UiPath, and Deutsche Börse alongside researchers from MIT Sloan, Scale AI, and Databricks), refusal behaviors were significantly degraded once safety patterns were shifted.
  • Published on
    If you are writing conventional web interfaces, it will be a good idea to take a pause and rethink your strategy. Instead of coding static UI for every workflow, what if we could generate UI on demand, directly from a users prompt? In this post, I explore the idea of intent-driven user interfaces that leverage AI to determine user intent and generate dynamic UIs on the fly.
  • Published on
    If you are exposing AI-enabled capabilities in your product and supporting external integrations, there is a good chance you will implement an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server to handle tool calls from LLMs. When you do, you will need to manage authentication, input validation, multi-tenant isolation, and more. Instead of starting from scratch, I have put together a starter-kit that gives you all this out of the box: JWT-based tenant authentication, input validation, per-function metadata, cloud-native & container-ready with Docker, and standard endpoints as per the MCP spec.